WEEKLY
INTELLIGENCE NOTES (WIN)
07-01 dated 19 February 2001
WINs contain selected intelligence notes and
commentaries produced by Roy Jonkers, with contributions by
Associate editors John Macartney and Don Harvey.
This WIN was delayed by AFIO internal meeting requirements. The
next WIN will follow shortly.
Warning
Notice: Perishability of Links: WINs, sent weekly
to members, often contain numerous webpage links to fast-breaking
news, documents or other items of interest; unfortunately, after
four weeks many of these websites [especially newspaper and other
media sites] remove items or shift them into fee-only archives.
This underscores the benefit of receiving the WINs as they are
released.
===================================================
SECTION I -
CURRENT INTELLIGENCE
BREAKING NEWS: FBI AGENT ARRESTED FOR
ESPIONAGE -- Robert Hanssen, a 27-year veteran of
FBI counterintelligence, was arrested Sunday, after servicing a
"dead drop." Hanssen is charged with having spied for the
Russians for more than 15 years. This sad case will be further
discussed in WIN 08-01 next week.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A28763-2001Feb20.html
(Jonkers)
TWO MORE ARRESTED IN COLE ATTACK
-- Two more suspects have been arrested in the bombing of the USS
Cole, but, according to Yemen's President , there is no
evidence that bin Laden was behind the kamikaze attack. The Arab
suspects were detained two days ago when they returned to Yemen
from Afghanistan. President Ali Abdallah Salih said that the main
suspect and an accomplice in the October attack were still at
large and believed to be living in Afghanistan. "But we have
no evidence or confessions linking" bin Laden to the attack.
He further noted that the cases of five or six detainees had been
sent to a Yemeni prosecutor, but U.S. officials had asked for the
trial to be delayed until the main suspects were arrested. Bin
Laden, also accused by Washington of masterminding the 1998
bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa, has denied involvement
in the attack on the Cole. (WashPost 19Feb p.28 //AP) (Jonkers)
RUSSIAN TACTICAL NUKES DEPLOYED TO
KALININGRAD -- On January 3rd, Bill Gertz reported in the
Washington Times that Russian tactical nuclear warheads had
been deployed to the Russian enclave on the Baltic, Kaliningrad.
On Feb 15, Gertz had another story on the subject. This time he
pinpointed satellite imagery of June 3 and June 6 as the
confirmation to US intelligence that nukes were going to
Kaliningrad -- there is no longer any doubt about it among US
officials, he wrote. Furthermore (and most interesting), Gertz
wrote on Feb 15 that the information was not sent to policymakers
until December - six months after the imagery was taken.
Intelligence Community officials deny this alleged withholding of
intelligence. After the first Gertz press revelation on January 3,
the State Dept felt it had to send a diplomatic note to Moscow -
which brought denials. The Feb 15 report will rub more salt into
that wound -- which was probably the intention of the US official
or officials who leaked the info to Gertz. -(Macartney)]
http://www.washtimes.com/national/default-2001215224952.htm
http://www.washtimes.com/national/inring-200121621294.htm
REP BARR (R-Ga) WOULD RESTORE US LICENSE
TO KILL -- For the 2nd year in row, Rep Bob Barr has
introduced legislation, "The Terrorist Elimination Act,"
that would repeal several executive orders that have, since 1976,
prohibited employees of the US Government, including any element
of the US Intelligence Community, from taking part in or abetting
a political assassination. The proposed bill has no co-sponsors
and will not go anywhere. Except for Barr, almost no one else in
Congress, the Executive Branch or the Intelligence Community wants
to see the US get into the assassination business.
http://www.washtimes.com/world/default-200129212114.htm
(Macartney)
ISRAELI HELICOPTER GUNSHIPS ASSASSINATE
SENIOR ARAFAT AIDE -- Masoud Ayyad, a LtCol in Yasser
Arafat's personal security detail, was targeted and killed in Gaza
by missiles from helicopter gunships fired at his automobile.
Although Israel has apparently assassinated at least a dozen
Palestinians in the past 2 or 3 months, this is the first one they
have acknowledged and explained.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A15175-2001Feb16.html
(Macartney)
POLICE FOIL NERVE GAS PLOT AGAINST LONDON
UNDERGROUND -- According to this news story, British
police have foiled a terrorist scheme to release sarin gas in the
London subway system.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/et?ac=003633010248390&rtmo=0x2RKxbq&atmo=
rrrrrrvs&pg=/et/01/2/18/nsar18 (Macartney)
SECTION II
- CONTEXT AND PRECEDENCE
CIA RECOMMENDATION IGNORED --
"One senior intelligence officer" was the unidentified
source of the recent report that the White House had solicited,
and then overrode, CIA's recommendation on the pardoning of the
former intelligence analyst, Samuel L. Morison. The only
government official ever convicted of leaking classified
information to the media, Morison had provided three secret
satellite photos of a Soviet aircraft carrier in a Northern Fleet
harbor to Jane's Defence Weekly. "We said we were
obviously opposed -- it was a vigorous 'Hell,no'," said the
intelligence official. "We think giving classified
information to people who are unauthorized to receive it is a bad
thing to do and giving pardons to people who are convicted of
doing that sends the wrong signal to people who are currently
entrusted with classified information."
Senator C. Shelby, the SSCI Chairman, has
launched an inquiry into both the Morison and the former DCI
Deutch pardons; the chairman said the Morison pardon would do
nothing to stop a torrent of media leaks in Washington and only
underscores the need for new legislation explicitly criminalizing
leaks. Conversely, the director of the Federation of American
Scientists' project on government secrecy, Steven Aftergood,
called the pardon "an act of moral courage." The
Aftergood favorable evaluation of the Clinton pardon action is
distinguished by its uniqueness. (Washington Post 17 Feb '01, p.
A6) (Harvey)
GERMAN INTELLIGENCE ALLEGEDLY WEIGHS IN ON
MISSILE DEFENSE -- The Bush Administration received
support from different source regarding its anti-missile shield
campaign. The German intelligence service, the BND, allegedly
leaked an intelligence report to the Frankfurter Allgemeine
Zeitung that suggests Berlin and Munich could be within target
range of Saddam Hussein's (hypothetical) postulated missiles. The
leaked report noted that Iraq was using familiar middlemen and new
procurement channels to buy missile components and was estimated
to be close again to producing missiles. The alleged BND report
hypothesized that by 2005 Iraq might be able to launch a missile
with at least one kilogram of anthrax bacteria - the suicidal
insane-dictator threat scenario. The newspaper also reported that
(aside from Israel), nine countries in the Middle East are
developing missiles. Two ground-to-ground missiles are in
production in Iran currently, and five states tested missiles last
year. It would appear the (politically attuned) BND has heard
enough of German leaders sympathizing with the Russian
anti-missile defense line and is trying to keep the German
government focused on the potential small-state threat rather than
Russian and Chinese anxieties. (London Times 16 Feb '01 //
Roger Boyes) (Harvey)
PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVES AND BRIEFS
-- The National Security Council has refused to release the
unclassified text of the Bush Administration's first
"National Security Presidential Directive." Presidential
directives are a largely unaccountable instrument of executive
authority. They are used to establish and implement national
security policy, and they often authorize the commitment of
government resources. They are usually classified and Congress is
not routinely notified of their existence or contents. The
previous Bush Administration did not declassify any of its
presidential directives in its first three years, although several
have been declassified since then. President Clinton did authorize
release of his first two "Presidential Decision
Directives," in 1993, but his later directives remain
classified.
In a related matter, DCI George Tenet remains firm in his position
that the President's Daily Briefs may not be released for
publication" no matter how old or historically significant
they may be. The President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB)
further holds that it "owns" the documents of its
predecessor agencies and opposes the documents' release. For
historians trying to explain US foreign policy, this is a
handicap. For national security, however, it is essential to
maintain confidentiality for at least a half century or sometimes
more.
http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/direct.htm
http://www.fas.org/sgp/advisory/state/hac0700.html
(Jonkers)
SECTION III
- CYBER NEWS
US CYBER-TERRORISM LEGISLATION PROPOSED
-- Reps. James Saxton, R-N.J., and Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., this
week introduced legislation that calls on the government to
develop a new legal framework to prosecute hackers and other
Internet criminals. Saxton and Chambliss offered a House
resolution that also labels cyber-terrorism "an emerging
threat to the national security of the United States which has the
potentiality to cause great harm to the nation's critical
infrastructure..." The resolution also calls for a
public-private industry partnership to combat cyber-crime, and a
multi-agency study to assess the threat of cyber-terrorism to the
US. The study would be conducted by the Commerce and Defense
Departments, along with the National Security Agency, the Central
Intelligence Agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Cyber-crime is a high priority not only in the US at this time,
but throughout the world. How to fight it is an issue that has
received far from unanimous agreement, however.
The
Council of Europe has adopted a draft-cyber-crime treaty, but many
privacy advocates as well as a number of corporate lobbying groups
have signaled their opposition to it.
http://www.newsbytes.com/news/01/161746.html
(Jonkers)
BRITISH CYBER TERRORISM LAW ADOPTED
-- Computer hackers could be classed as terrorists under a UK law
that came into force today. The Terrorism Act 2000 is designed to
prevent dissident political groups from using the UK as a base for
terrorism and recognizes a new threat from cyberterrorists for the
first time. But the Act also significantly widens the definition
of terrorism to include those actions that "seriously
interfere with or seriously disrupt an electronic system".
According to the Act this only applies to actions "designed
to influence the government or to intimidate the public," but
it will be up to police investigators to decide when this is the
case. The Act gives police the power to detain suspects for
48-hours without a warrant.
http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/2001/7/ns-21060.html
(Levine Newsbits 2/19)(Jonkers)
SECTION IV
- BOOKS AND SOURCES
US ARMY INTELLIGENCE & SECURITY
COMMAND ARCHIVES -- Interesting [international] files,
slated for destruction this year under INSCOM's records
retention policies, can be requested from the Army INSCOM by name
and file number. This is the last chance you'll have to obtain any
of this before it is shredded. To get any of these, or the list of
documents available, send a letter, mentioning the Freedom of
Information Act, to: Mr. Russell A. Nichols, Chief, Freedom of
Information Act Office, United States Army Intelligence &
Security Command, Fort George G. Meade, Md. 20755-5995 //or phone:
301-677-4501 or FAX: 1-301-677-2956 (Attn: Joanne Benear)
(courtesy L. Sulc, J. Goulden, et.al) (Jonkers)
SECTION V --
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
AFIO member Patrick Hughes (Lt General, USA ret),
former Director DIA, recently published his perspectives on the
urgent need for greater support to the US Intelligence Community.
Using the editor's prerogative of reducing his eloquent remarks
to a few salient points, he notes:
We must be realistic about the nature of the
threats we face. Knowledge, the best we can get, unburdened by all
but the burden of truth, is the first line of defense. We cannot
afford, in this dangerous age, to absorb a blow that might take a
million lives and disrupt our societal core. We must have
information (intelligence) to empower our weapons and other
capabilities. Intelligence is dependent on actions NOW to have
benefit LATER. These include:
* People -- The key to improved
intelligence is to get the very best people to do this vital
work.
* Policy -- It is necessary to
have a clear and unambiguous set of policies to govern the work
of intelligence. It is more necessary than ever that our
policies for the conduct of intelligence legally maximize the
potential of our endeavors. It is important that these policies
protect information and the means we use to gather it, so our
ability to engage in the global environment can be sustained.
* Technology -- Every element
of U.S. intelligence is in need of upgrading and revitalization.
* Leadership -- Revitalization
demands inspired management and insightful leadership to
maximize the return on our national investment. Information used
as an internecine political weapon, and the politicization of
intelligence at the national and departmental levels of
government, must be eliminated.
* Money
-- Personnel costs consume approximately 50 percent of
the budget of each operating element of the intelligence
community. There has been a steady increase in this percentile
over the past 10 years. This "net" increase in the
cost of sustaining the work force has reduced discretionary
fiscal resources and has led to an annual contest between
required capability and inadequate resources. How much is needed
to revitalize the nation's intelligence capability while
continuing its operations? In my view something in the
neighborhood of an additional $1.5 billion to $2 billion
annually over the next 10 years is necessary to meet national
requirements.
* Solutions -- There are no
clear or simple solutions. The beginning of the debate, led by
the new administration, is critical if we are to prepare for and
meet the coming threats and challenges. The goal is clear:
revitalize and reorder the U.S. intelligence community to better
meet the threats and challenges of the future. (LGEN Patrick M.
Hughes, former Director DIA)
(Wash Times 31 Dec 2000; Jan 3, 2001, Current News
Supplement: and Feb 4, 2001, pg B5) (Jonkers)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
WINs are intended to provide a balanced assessment
of selective open source articles on US intelligence issues and
threat-related topics, for non-profit educational purposes. Views
and opinions are those of the authors and editors mentioned in the
bylines. WINs are available by subscription. See AFIO Website (www.afio.com)
for particulars and for back issues stored with a two-month delay.
WINs are protected by copyright laws. Reproduction
and dissemination with permission of the producer/editor only.
AFIO members -- Support AFIO
and the Intelligence Community - sponsor a new member!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++end++++++++++++++++++++++++++